OLKILUOTO, FINLAND – Deep within the bedrock in western Finland, flashing lights from heavy machinery cast shadows in eerie tunnels that lead to a tomb that must remain unperturbed for millennia.
There is a reason the catacomb on the lush island of Olkiluoto was buried 400 meters below ground: It will house the world’s first spent nuclear fuel disposal facility.
The project, which aims to solve the age-old quagmire of what to do with nuclear waste, is nearing completion in a region that is already home to Europe’s largest nuclear reactor.
The Onkalo repository is designed to house a total of 6,500 metric tons of uranium, covering the spent fuel produced by Finland’s five nuclear reactors during their lifetime.
Low-carbon nuclear power has been hailed as a climate-friendly energy source as the world struggles to combat global warming.
Environmentalists, however, worry about their safety and warn that disposing radioactive waste carries huge risks.
Around 400,000 metric tons of used fuel have been discharged from reactors worldwide so far, the World Nuclear Association estimates, most of which is kept in temporary storage facilities near power plants.
But the long-term storage problem has cast a shadow over nuclear projects.
Onkalo’s operator Posiva has developed its solution together with the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB).
The plan is to encapsulate the used uranium in thick copper shells and bury the up to five-meter-long canisters in the bedrock, before sealing the tunnel with a massive, wedge-shaped and steel-reinforced concrete plug.
Construction began at Onkalo — Finnish for “hollow” — in 2004, and final trials will be conducted in early 2024.
“Once we have established that we are ready, we can then move on to the actual operational phase in the mid-2020s,” said geologist Johanna Hansen, Onkalo’s research and development coordinator.
The immense amount of time it takes for radiation to decrease to safe levels poses significant challenges.
It can take around 250,000 years for the high-level toxic waste to reach the radiation levels of a naturally occurring uranium deposit.
Put in context, 250,000 years ago Europe was in the midst of an Ice Age and was home to Neanderthals and mammoths, while Homo sapiens had only recently emerged in Africa.
In other words, before the waste no longer poses a threat to the environment or people, the landscape of Olkiluoto island may have changed dramatically.
Posiva insists their canisters are designed to withstand even major changes taking place on Earth.
But some experts have cast doubt on the Finnish-Swedish disposal method.
“It is not a solution, it’s a reduction of risk,” Jan Haverkamp, nuclear energy expert at Greenpeace, said.
Haverkamp claimed that Posiva is giving “no real attention” to the discourse around corrosion of the copper canister in Sweden.
For example, researchers at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) have questioned the plan’s safety by highlighting greater risks of copper corrosion than previously acknowledged, which could result in leakage.
“The case for not producing more waste is still standing as strong as it was standing 20 years ago,” he added.
Posiva and SKB have rebutted KTH’s experimental studies, and the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority has concluded that the plans meet the requirements of nuclear and radiation safety.
Allison Macfarlane, professor at the University of British Columbia, said that while no plan is “100% safe,” Onkalo is “certainly the solution that’s received the most research.”
The alternative, she added, would be “leaving the waste where it is above ground without a plan indefinitely.”
If the nuclear waste is left above ground and our society falls apart, “it will definitely get into the environment and affect humans,” she explained.
She believes that in a reasonably selected location, the waste “will remain safe for thousands and tens of thousands of years.”
“I think it is the internationally agreed-upon solution to the problem of nuclear waste,” Macfarlane said.
Locations for potential nuclear waste repositories have been selected in Sweden, France and Switzerland, with Canada close to making a decision.
“Now that we are leading the way, others are following and doing the same,” Posiva’s Hansen said.
But many projects have faced resistance and locations have been difficult to agree on, such as France’s Cigeo project in the country’s northeast.
In April, Finland’s next-generation Olkiluoto 3 nuclear reactor, the largest in Europe, went into regular production.
A poll published the same month by the trade association Finnish Energy showed record-high support for nuclear energy in Finland, with 68% of Finns in favor.
“Sweden and Finland have shown us that the technical challenges can be surmounted,” Macfarlane said.
“Other challenges that need to be addressed are the political ones.”
Source: Japan Times
